<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mintz Law &#187; Firearms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mintzlaw.com/tag/firearms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mintzlaw.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:27:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Paying for Guns with Drugs Establishes Possession of a Firearm in Furtherance of Drug Trafficking</title>
		<link>http://www.mintzlaw.com/2010/03/paying-for-guns-with-drugs-establishes-possession-of-a-firearm-in-furtherance-of-drug-trafficking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mintzlaw.com/2010/03/paying-for-guns-with-drugs-establishes-possession-of-a-firearm-in-furtherance-of-drug-trafficking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marshall A. Mintz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18 USC 924]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mintzlaw.com/?p=239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In United States v. Gardner/Gladden, 08-47930-cr (2d Cir. March 10, 2010), appellants challenged the district court’s instruction to the jury that it could find a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) if it found that the defendants “acquired the firearm by paying for it with drugs involved in the conspiracy.”
In rejecting that challenge, the Court [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">In <a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/98a98c26-38a4-4d73-bd51-6639ace914a7/4/doc/08-4793-cr_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/98a98c26-38a4-4d73-bd51-6639ace914a7/4/hilite/">United States v. Gardner/Gladden, 08-47930-cr (2d Cir. March 10, 2010)</a>, appellants challenged the district court’s instruction to the jury that it could find a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) if it found that the defendants “acquired the firearm by paying for it with drugs involved in the conspiracy.”</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In rejecting that challenge, the Court joined the First, Fourth, Sixth, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits and held that when a defendant acquires a firearm using drugs as payment, he possesses that firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mintzlaw.com/2010/03/paying-for-guns-with-drugs-establishes-possession-of-a-firearm-in-furtherance-of-drug-trafficking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

